US Betrayal
US Betrayal
US veto Palestinian UN entry despite 12 "yes" votes and two abstentions; thus, positioned itself against an over-whelming majority of the global community
US betrays its conscience by vetoing Palestine's UN entry
By China Daily
However, by vetoing the application from 13.5 million Palestinians, despite 12 "yes" votes and two abstentions, the US has once again positioned itself against an over-whelming majority of the global community in matters of conscience.
This action has not only thwarted the aspirations of the Palestinian people but also prompted scrutiny over the fairness and immediacy in addressing their rights. Doubts cast on Palestine's ability to govern and its peace commitments are only a means to divert attention from what are their fundamental rights. The insistence on direct nego-tiations overlooks the shifting dynamics in the region, including the decreasing sup-port from Israel for a two-state solution.
It's Israeli settlement expansion on the western bank of the Jordan River that has re-stricted the space for a Palestine state since the time it applied for UN membership in 2011. It's the superpower's unwarranted support of Israel that eroded the basis of a two-state solution, which is the only path toward lasting peace.
At a time when Israeli forces are still in Gaza and an attack on Rafah is still possible, it's more urgent now than at any time in history to accept the Palestine state as a full UN member. It's also time for the US to realign with the course of history that favors justice and peace.
Read more here.
US vetoes Palestine’s request for full UN membership
UN Press
In a vote of 12 in favour to one against, with two abstentions, the Council did not adopt a draft resolution that would have recommended the General Assembly to hold a vote with the broader UN membership to allow Palestine to join as a full UN Member State.
The draft resolution is among the shortest in the Council’s history: “The Security Council, having examined the application of the State of Palestine for admission to the United Nations (S/2011/592), recommends to the General Assembly that the State of Palestine be admitted to membership in the United Nations.”
For a draft resolution to pass, the Council must have at least nine members in favour and none of its permanent members – China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, United States – using their veto power.
Amid the ongoing war in Gaza, Palestine had submitted a request to the Secretary-General on 2 April, asking that a 2011 request to become a UN Member State be reconsidered.
In 2011, the Security Council considered the request but was not able to find unity in sending a recommendation to the General Assembly, which according to the UN Charter must hold a vote involving its 193 Member States.
Earlier this month, the Security Council sent the latest request to its Committee on the Admission of Member States, which met on 8 and 11 April to discuss the matter.
Palestine has been a Permanent Observer at the UN since 2012, before which it was an observer in the UN General Assembly.
Read our explainer to find out more about Palestine’s status at the UN here.
US completely isolated: Russia
Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia said this marked the fifth time the United States has vetoed a Council resolution since the start of the current hostilities in Gaza.
The US “once again demonstrated what they really think of the Palestinians”, he said. “For Washington, they do not deserve to have their own State. They are only a barrier on the path towards realising the interests of Israel.”
He said at present, an absolute majority of the global community supports Palestine’s application to become a full member of the UN.
“Today’s use of the veto by the US delegation is a hopeless attempt to stop the inevitable course of history. The results of the vote, where Washington was practically in complete isolation, speak for themselves,” he said.
Reforms needed: US
US Deputy Permanent Representative Robert Wood said Council members have a special responsibility to ensure that their actions further the cause of international peace and security and are consistent with the requirements of the UN Charter.
He said the report of the Committee on the Admission of New Members reflected that there was not unanimity among members as to whether the applicant met the criteria for membership, in line with Article IV of the UN Charter.
For example, there are unresolved questions as to whether the applicant meets the criteria to be considered a State, he said.
“We have long called on the Palestinian Authority to undertake necessary reforms to help establish the attributes of readiness for statehood and note that Hamas, a terrorist organisation, is currently exerting power and influence in Gaza – an integral part of the State envisioned in this resolution,” he said.
It is for these reasons, that the US voted “no”, he explained.
Mr. Wood said the US continues to strongly support a two-State solution.
“This vote does not reflect opposition to Palestinian statehood, but instead is an acknowledgment that it will only come from direct negotiations between the parties,” he said.
China: UN membership more urgent than ever before
Chinese Ambassador Fu Cong said the decades-long dream of the Palestinian people has been quashed at a time when the admission of Palestine as a full member of the UN is more urgent than ever before.
Over the past 13 years, the situation in Palestine has changed, namely settlement expansion, so questioning Palestine’s ability to govern is not acceptable, he said.
The establishment of an independent State is an inalienable right that cannot be questioned, he continued. The admission of Palestine as a full member at the UN would indeed help in negotiations with Israel on a two-State solution.
The wheels of history are rolling forward, and Palestine and Israel will one day live in peace, side by side, Mr. Fu said, pledging China’s support with a view to seeing that day happen.
Palestine upholds right to self-determination
Riyad Mansour, Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine, said his people’s right to self-determination has never once been subject to bargaining or negotiation.
It is a natural, historic and legal right “to live in our homeland, Palestine, as an independent State that is free and that is sovereign,” he said.
“We came to the Security Council today as an important historic moment, regionally and internationally, so that we could salvage what can be saved. We place you before a historic responsibility to establish the foundations of a just and comprehensive peace in our region.”
Council members were given the opportunity “to revive the hope that has been lost among our people” and to translate their commitment towards a two-State solution into firm action “that cannot be maneuvered or retracted”, and the majority of Council members “have risen to the level of this historic moment, and they have stood on the side of justice and freedom and hope, in line with the ethical and humanitarian and legal principles that must govern our world and in line with simple logic.”
Mr. Mansour expressed appreciation to the countries who supported Palestine’s request for UN membership and to those who voted in favour of the draft resolution.
“The fact that this resolution did not pass will not break our will, and it will not defeat our determination,” he said.
“We will not stop in our effort. The State of Palestine is inevitable. It is real. Perhaps they see it as far away, but we see it as near, and we are the faithful.”
Israel: ‘Your vote will make peace almost impossible’
Israeli Ambassador Gilad Erdan said the Palestine Authority is a terror-supporting entity, “paying terrorists to slaughter us”, and Palestinians do not even recognise Israel as a Jewish State.
He said Hamas was not mentioned here today because the Palestinian representative here does not represent at least half the Palestinian population.
“Regardless of the Palestinians’ failure to meet the necessary criteria for UN membership, most of you sadly decided to reward Palestinian terror with a Palestinian State,” he said. “It’s very sad because your vote will only embolden Palestinian rejectionism even more and make peace almost impossible.”
For full coverage of this and other meetings of major UN bodies, visit UN Meetings Coverage in English and French.
Read more here.
GCC, Gulf countries denounce US Veto
By Al Arabiya (with agencies)
Countries across the GCC and wider Middle East have expressed regret on Friday over the UN Security Council’s failure to recognize a Palestinian state. The UAE said that granting Palestinians full membership in the United Nations would be “an important step to boost peace efforts in the region.”
Saudi Arabia’s foreign ministry also denounced the decision, saying in a statement that obstructing a full membership of the State of Palestine at the UN contributes to Israel’s continued violations of the rules of international law. The Kingdom repeated its call on the international community to assume its responsibilities to end the Israeli occupation’s attack on civilians in Gaza, and to support the Palestinians determine their fate and establish a state per the 1967 borders with east Jerusalem as its capital.
Qatar also expressed regret over the failure of the UN Security Council to adopt a draft resolution recognizing a Palestinian state through full membership of the United Nations, Reuters reported, citing an official source.
Jordan also voiced its dismay at the Security Council’s inability to approve a resolution that would have admitted the State of Palestine as a full member of the UN due to the US veto power.
In a statement, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates reaffirmed that the international community is in favor of the two-state solution, which Israel is undermining.
It added that the Security Council must recognize the Palestinian state in order to stop Israel from depriving the Palestinian people of their right to freedom and their own state.
The ministry spokesperson, Ambassador Sufian Qudah, said that Jordan demands that all nations acknowledge the State of Palestine on the lines of June 4, 1967, with East Jerusalem as its capital, as a prerequisite to achieving regional peace and security.
Recognising the Palestinian state and its full membership is a necessary step to impose a just peace that ends the occupation, ends the conflict, and fulfils the right of all the peoples of the region to live in security and stability, Ambassador Qudah emphasised.
“The world knows that Israel is undermining the two-state solution and killing the chances of achieving it.”
The United States on Thursday effectively stopped the United Nations from recognizing a Palestinian state by casting a veto in the Security Council to deny Palestinians full membership of the world body.
It vetoed a draft resolution that recommended to the 193-member UN General Assembly that “the State of Palestine be admitted to membership.” Britain and Switzerland abstained, while the remaining 12 council members voted yes.
“The United States continues to strongly support a two-state solution. This vote does not reflect opposition to Palestinian statehood, but instead is an acknowledgment that it will only come from direct negotiations between the parties,” Deputy US Ambassador to the UN Robert Wood told the council.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas condemned the US veto in a statement as “unfair, unethical, and unjustified.”
Palestinian UN Ambassador Riyad Mansour, at times emotional, told the council after the vote: “The fact that this resolution did not pass will not break our will and it will not defeat our determination. We will not stop in our effort.”
The Palestinian push for full UN membership came six months into a war between Israel and Palestinian militants Hamas in the Gaza Strip, and as Israel is expanding settlements in the occupied West Bank, which the UN considers to be illegal.
Israel’s Foreign Minister Israel Katz commended the United States for casting a veto. Addressing the 12 council members who voted in favor of the draft resolution, Israel’s UN Ambassador Gilad Erdan said: “It’s very sad because your vote will only embolden Palestinian rejectionism even more and make peace almost impossible.”
Read more here.